Manipulation, mistrust and adoption: paradoxical responses to AI in companies
• A study conducted by Natalia Vuori (Aalto University, Finland) has identified four trust configurations (full trust, full distrust, uncomfortable trust, and blind trust) that determine how employees interact with AI.
• Some employees deliberately manipulate AI tools, compromising the accuracy of their results. Deterioration in the reliability of these tools may then create a ‘vicious cycle’ within companies.
• Managers are well-advised to adopt approaches to AI that reflect levels of trust among employees while reassuring them about the use of data and emphasising concrete benefits.
Read the article
• Some employees deliberately manipulate AI tools, compromising the accuracy of their results. Deterioration in the reliability of these tools may then create a ‘vicious cycle’ within companies.
• Managers are well-advised to adopt approaches to AI that reflect levels of trust among employees while reassuring them about the use of data and emphasising concrete benefits.
An example of secure and fluid mobile use of generative AI with compliance analysis by video at the MWC
Read the article
Agricultural robots and their growing potential for farmers
Read the article
The future of AgTech will depend on the better integration of data and interoperable solutions – R. Faroux
Read the article
Explainability of artificial intelligence systems: what are the requirements and limits?
Read the article
AI fed on data from gas sensors and smart cameras prevents workplace accidents
Read the article